In modern English, it is perfectly acceptable to use between or between specific contexts if one refers to more than two participants. The most common names that have often been followed by between: link, difference, distinction, link, relationship: GrammarGirl has made quite a contribution. She explains that there is a difference between and between. She writes: But where there are more than two parties involved, one can use them to express relationships from couples to one within the group or the feeling `shared`: `There is a close friendship between the members of the club`; diplomatic relations between the United States, Canada and Mexico. If you think that coming in and below is a rewarding use of time by anyone, you are in the heavy need of purdoctrination. Thank you for showing up in 14 Five Bell Lane, Nether Wallop, Hampshire, England, with a tin leaf hat on your head, ring the doorbell and say, “I`m here to learn more about active drawing.” I didn`t see any difference between real pockets and imitation pockets. There is a persistent but unsubstantiated idea that “in between” can only be used by two elements and that “under” must be used for more than two. “Between” has been used since the old English of more than two; A 1:1 relationship should be specifically designated regardless of the number of elements. I was easily surprised to find that I apparently never wrote anything on this blog on which I should use, enter or below, if I list the parties to a contract, in the introductory clause or elsewhere. Here`s what MSCD 2.46-48 has to say: I gave some money to Yolanda and Lynn and told them to share it among themselves. The traditionalist view is that “between” should only be used if there are only two objects to compare; and “under” or “under” should be used for more than two objects. Most style guides and dictionaries do not support this advisor and say that “between” can be used to refer to something that is in time, space or in the interval that separates more than two elements. M-W says the idea that only two elements can be used is “persistent but unfounded” and AHD4 calls it a “largely repeated but unjustified tradition.” The OED says: “In every sense, between its first appearance was extended to more than two.” Chambers says, “It is acceptable to use “in-between” in reference to more than two people or things,” although it is said that “in particular circumstances” may be more appropriate.
The children were between 12 and 16 years old. (Exact)- As such, the rule covers most of the issues related to these words, but it does not give the full picture, and the difference between those words is not always so clear. Of this, you are right when using between. “Cook and. al.” belonged to a separate group of individuals, so you would use in between. It is often taught that “between” is used for 2 items and “under” for 3 or more. The right phrase is “between you and me” – never “between you and me” – it`s something that confuses even native speakers! Why did I make this effort? Indeed, so far, I have thought about going in and below only for the purposes of the introductory clause.