Wto Safeguards Agreement

Once a security device has been implemented, it will need to be gradually liberalized over time. As a general rule, protection measures should not last more than four years, but they can be extended for up to eight years if the country implementing the protection measure deems it necessary to prevent or repair serious injuries. Developing countries are allowed to maintain security measures for up to 10 years. All safeguards require the payment of compensation – in the form of substantially equivalent trade concessions – for each implementation beyond three years. For example, the “specific safeguard measures” in Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the “transitional guarantees” under Article 6 of the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Textiles apply only to agricultural or textile products. See chapters 6 and 9 of this book. Yes, yes. If you are aware of security measures that are either detrimental to your company`s export or able to do so, contact the U.S. Department of Commerce`s Office of Trade Agreements Negotiations and Compliance hotline. The U.S. government has information and assistance for U.S. companies who believe they have been harmed by a WTO member country`s non-compliance with the agreement.

While it cannot guarantee that your problem can be resolved, the U.S. government can, if necessary, discuss the specific facts of your situation with officials from the other country concerned. b) In addition, a member cannot seek, take or maintain voluntary export restrictions, orderly marketing agreements or similar measures on the export or import side. (3), (4) These include measures taken by a single member and measures within the framework of agreements, agreements and agreements reached by two or more members. Any such measure, in effect on the date of the WTO agreement, is brought into compliance with this agreement or expires in accordance with paragraph 2. The Secretary-General`s enterprise agreement was widely negotiated due to the increasing application by gaTT contracting parties of a large number of so-called “shadow zones” measures (voluntary bilateral export restrictions, ordered marketing agreements and similar measures) to limit imports of certain products. These measures were not imposed under Article XIX and are therefore not subject to the multilateral discipline of the GATT and the legality of these measures under the GATT was questionable.

Comments are closed.